Re: Debian crosscompiler packages
Dr. David Alan Gilbert writes:
> * Hakan Ardo (hakan@debian.org) wrote:
> That I had written:
>
> > > Personally I'd prefer that the name is passed-as-is to the gcc/binutils
> > > configures; because I normally know what to give those to get what I
> > > want. I'd agree with adding the -linux in if it was for everything,
> > > but since this package has the ability to build for things Linux won't
> > > run on (e.g. AVR - anyone fancy a small port....) I'd rather not do it
> > > conditionally.
> >
> > I can see the point in that. Do we want the package names to be
> > gcc-avr-linux and binutils-avr-linux as well instead of simply gcc-avr and
> > binutils-avr?
>
> Erm no; avr to be gcc-avr, alpha-linux to be gcc-alpha-linux ?
assuming, that new Debian ports are made for bsd and cygwin, I would
prefer including the os name, even for linux.
Reply to: