Re: gcc 3.1.1 to 3.2 transition
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 08:45:30PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Daniel,
> Well if gcc 3.1.1 instantly disappears the moment gcc 3.2 hits the pool,
> won't that force openoffice/stl to deinstall on a dist-upgrade? It would
> nicer if we allows folks a grace period for their apps to get rebuilt
> before yanking the supporting libs they need.
> Jack
> ps The grace period could be shorter, perhaps a week or even a few days,
> but I don't know if it is good to pull gcc 3.1.1 the moment 3.2 hits.
The libstdc++ doesn't need to be yanked, but the compiler certainly
does.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: