Please do another gcc-3.0 upload (was: Re: katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions)

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

James Troup writes:
 > James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:
 > 
 > > This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version
 > > numbers and if someone (say, doko@ ;-) uploaded a source package
 > > with an older version than previously existed, it would be
 > > auto-deleted in favour of the existent older-but-newer-by-version
 > > package.
 > 
 > Err, as Ryan just pointed out, this 1:3.0.1-0pre010723 upload will
 > never be rebuilt by any other architecture.  They all compare their
 > binaries to the current source and their binaries claim to have been
 > built from (what is, in dpkg terms) a newer version.  So, could
 > someone please do another gcc upload (with fixed source version) ASAP?

already done. the epoch now is part of the source version and the
versioning schema changed, so that we don't get theis trouble for 3.1
-> 3.1.1 again.