[Freedombox-discuss] Diaspora becoming a community project
- Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] Diaspora becoming a community project
- From: email@example.com (simo)
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 13:28:13 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- References: <CACXcFmm8WnNrc+ZAX26FawZeu6DN6S2YrP-srhs8pAE7AANW8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMhXSQp9429bfdJ+HMQA-jSFMNw8VffJPLyRVCYppWDMVEtzhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJkfFBzvaLuRWo6yb_4urabRPUWBZ+EhjyEV2P82EM6QbvuGHw@mail.gmail.com> <503DD718.firstname.lastname@example.org> <CACEE+iPXRyfdFSyeUC=Bsr+VqGaqKqeZYH58H6a6RSm50FfumA@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com> <20120830092059.GE28953@jones.dk> <503F73D6.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20120830165135.GM28953@jones.dk> <[🔎] email@example.com>
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 17:37 +0200, Leandro Noferini wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> writes:
> >> For example here in Italy it is all but easy to have a static ip address
> >> in home connections: again for example my ISP does not sell this kind
> >> of service at all.
> >> This is what I mean "normal".
> > So you really mean normal consumer access to internet, not normal
> > FreedomBox?
> Yes, almost here in Italy, having a static ip address in home
> connections it is not normal.
Not only you do not have static ip addresses, often not even public ip
address, but just dynamic private addresses and NAT.
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>