[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Freedombox-discuss] Diaspora becoming a community project




----- Original Message -----
> From: simo <idra at samba.org>
> To: Leandro Noferini <lnoferin at cybervalley.org>
> Cc: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 1:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Diaspora becoming a community project
> 
> On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 17:37 +0200, Leandro Noferini wrote: 
>>? Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> writes:
>> 
>> 
>>? [...]
>> 
>>? >> For example here in Italy it is all but easy to have a static ip 
> address
>>? >> in? home connections: again for example my ISP does not sell this 
> kind
>>? >> of service at all.
>>? >> 
>>? >> This is what I mean "normal".
>>? >
>>? > So you really mean normal consumer access to internet, not normal 
>>? > FreedomBox?
>> 
>>? Yes, almost here in Italy, having a static ip address in home
>>? connections it is not normal.
> 
> Not only you do not have static ip addresses, often not even public ip
> address, but just dynamic private addresses and NAT.

Any one of the machines behind a NAT like that can run Tor as we
speak, with the click of a button, using the Tor Browser Bundle.? They
can also?make a?hidden service available to the rest of the network,
though AFAIK that requires more setup (but no NAT reconfiguration).

-Jonathan

> 
> Simo.
> 
> -- 
> Simo Sorce
> Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
> Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>




Reply to: