[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Freedombox-discuss] towards a business plan


On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin
<marc at petit-huguenin.org> wrote:
.. snip ...
>> Yes, SIP is very good in many ways, but at ServalProject.org at least,
>> we are looking to create a simple alternative protocol (open of
>> course) which will tolerate latency and excessive packet loss much
>> better than SIP does,
> I guess you mean RTP, not SIP here.

Excuse my sloppy lumping of RTP and SIP together; my concern is with
them jointly and severally.
Neither is good in bad packet loss, which is reasonable, as they were
not designed with it in mind.


>> and will be substantially more bandwidth
>> efficient when calls are not in progress.
> - --
> Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Personal email: marc at petit-huguenin.org
> Professional email: petithug at acm.org
> Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> iEYEARECAAYFAk10GAIACgkQ9RoMZyVa61czcACeO3Al4EgJimKrIHanbt8d3sSM
> wnoAn3QIUgkfwWPchMQ3zQ0Mql1HMFt8
> =9kmc

Reply to: