[Freedombox-discuss] Debian FreedomBox = Existing Debian packages on plug hardware
On 1 March 2011 15:36, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:44:09PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:53:33PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>> The target for the Freedom Box is a plug device. These have
>>>>> 800Mhz/1.2Ghz ARM processors and 512MB of RAM and at least 512MB
>>>> Yes, you're describing a low-end Android phone here.
>>> No, plug devices are not phones.
>> My point you possibly failed to get was that openi-sh cheap (~100 EUR)
>> smartphones have equivalent to superior hardware specs to plug computers,
> Phones are not Plug devices, even if some specs are comparable.
>>>> The only problem I see is Android specifics, which won't play nice with
>>>> the Debian toolchain.
>>> If I am not mistaken, the topic of this mailinglist is the _Debian_
>>> FreedomBox project. ?Not the Google FreedomBox project or whatever else.
>> I'm not sure what your point is.
> This mailinglist was created in direct response to a talk made in July at a
> Debian conference, where Eben Moglen challenged the Debian community to put
> the already production-ready Debian distro onto the already production-ready
> Plug devices, "just" make the combination dead simple for non-geeks to
> ?Debian supports Plug devices, not Android phones. ?Debian also support a
> gazillion devices other than Plug devices, and a gazillion other use cases,
> but I dare say this particular project was created with the relatively
> narrow scope of consumer-friendly design + Plug devices + Debian subset of
> freedom-enabling technologies.
What about Eben's original talk about NYU a year ago, 'Freedom in the
Cloud', where he coined the term 'Freedom Box'?
I believe he mentioned both Fedora and Debian.. IMHO he was promoting
the idea of free software in the freedom box, and selected Debian as a
leader rather than an absolute.
> Not phones. Not OpenWrt. Not virtual machines. Not freeing new hardware.
> ?Not inventing, implementing or packaging new technologies. ?All those tasks
> are very very VERY relevant for World Freedoms, but for this project they
> are relevant only as inspirational references.
>> I would suggest rather keep technical lists focused on their respective
>> topic, but build an inclusive umbrella platform with multiple ongoing
>> external projects having their sublists and wikis and code depositories,
>> with some crosscommunication do avoid duplication of effort and encourage
>> crossporting of existing and emerging packages.
>> Is there any reason why Debian would officially oppose hosting such a
> I suppose not. ?But check for yourself at http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth -
> especially the link to "Guidelines for packaging projects on Alioth".
> ?- Jonas
> ?* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> ?* Tlf.: +45 40843136 ?Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
> ?[x] quote me freely ?[ ] ask before reusing ?[ ] keep private
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org