Also, how about these? https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=OFL-FAQ.txt&mode=filename&suite=unstable&arch=any - Fabian Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Bobby de Vos <bobby_devos@sil.org> Datum: 16.11.20 18:43 (GMT+01:00) An: Sean Whitton <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>, fabian@debian.org, Debian Fonts Task Force <debian-fonts@lists.debian.org> Betreff: Re: fonts-sil-scheherazadenew_3.000-1_amd64.changes REJECTED > > +----------------------+ > | REJECT reasoning | > +----------------------+ > > There is no indication that OFL-FAQ.txt is DFSG-free. I don't understand. The copyright file includes a Files: * statement that specifies OFL-1.1. I would have thought that would specify the license for OFL-FAQ.txt file. I realize now that the license should have been OFL-1.1-RFN instead of OFL-1.1. Would this change address the issue? Bobby -- Bobby de Vos /bobby_devos@sil.org/ |