On 2020-11-12 1:10 p.m., Sean Whitton wrote: > > +----------------------+ > | REJECT reasoning | > +----------------------+ > > There is no indication that OFL-FAQ.txt is DFSG-free. I don't understand. The copyright file includes a Files: * statement that specifies OFL-1.1. I would have thought that would specify the license for OFL-FAQ.txt file. I realize now that the license should have been OFL-1.1-RFN instead of OFL-1.1. Would this change address the issue? Bobby -- Bobby de Vos /bobby_devos@sil.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature