Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2020-02-17 08:32:49) > Am 17.02.2020 02:52, schrieb Adam Borowski: > > and late suggestion from the last discussions were: > > * removal or demotion to Recommends of regular noto (reason: spams > > font selection dialogs to the point of making them unusable) > > Yes, please kill fonts-noto. Adding 150 individual entries to the font > selection dialog is not useful. We really cannot "recommend" this. Then I don't understand the purpose of this package: It explicitly says in its long description that it is for users not caring about bloat, and "coverage of all writing systems". > Am 17.02.2020 03:12, schrieb Norbert Preining: > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Adam Borowski wrote: > >> # TeX > >> fonts-urw-base35, > > > > Not relevant for TeX, can be dropped from the list from the TeX > > point of view. Of course, the fonts might be useful for other > > reasons. > > It's definitely useful (read: crucial) for viewing Postscript and PDF > documents, so please keep it. If crucial for specific applications, please file bugreports against those applications - have us *not* paper of such issues by pulling it in here. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature