[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#780233: fonts-inconsolata: Please package v1.014 from Google Font Directory



Package: fonts-inconsolata
Version: 001.010-5
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I found out on wikipedia that the inconsolata font has been forked on
Google Foot Directory. It has been fully hinted and a bold variant
created.

Project directory:
https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/

ChangeLog:

18 September 2012 (Alexei Vanyashiin) Inconsolata bold v. 1.014
- Fixed spacing issue associated with the character "4" and "0"
- Applied ttfautohint (to fix windows rendering problem that occurred in
  v 1.000)

7 December 2011 (Kirill Tkachev) Inconsolata Bold v. 1.000
- Completed Bold version of Inconsolata in VBF format.

https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/FONTLOG.txt

That would probably close https://bugs.debian.org/618568 which state the
bold font is too wide in konsole.  I only have Medium and Oblique
myself but that is an other story.

-- Package-specific info:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version      Architecture Description
+++-==============-============-============-=================================
ii  fontconfig     2.11.0-6.3   amd64        generic font configuration librar
ii  libfreetype6:a 2.5.2-3      amd64        FreeType 2 font engine, shared li
ii  libxft2:amd64  2.3.2-1      amd64        FreeType-based font drawing libra

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: