On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:14:59AM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote: > Its Pubic License is Copyleft, somehow similar to the GPL. and I think it > meets the demands of DFSG. Hi, I think ARPHIC PUBLIC LICENSE fails to comply with DFSG due to the following text: ### from ARPHIC PUBLIC LICENSE ... "Freely Available" means that you have the freedom to copy or modify the Font as well as redistribute copies of the Font under the same conditions you received but only for non-profit purpose. ... You must make such modifications Freely Available as a whole to all third parties under the terms of this License, such as by offering access to copy the modifications from a designated place, or distributing the modifications on a medium customarily used for software interchange. ... ### end ARPHIC PUBLIC LICENSE The term "freely available" is defined as "only for non-profit purpose", which does not meet the DFSG article 6, "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor". -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@gmail.com> http://czchen.info/ Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature