Quoting Theppitak Karoonboonyanan (thep@linux.thai.net):
> Sorry, I missed this thread, and was surprised to see new font
> packages with this convention, which is different from what I read
> long time ago:
>
> https://github.com/rbrito/fonts-policy/blob/master/fonts_policy.mdwn
>
> To my understanding, "fonts" is to be used with source package,
> not binary. Is there any documentation I've missed?
Probably not. We just haven't applied the policy draft entirely.
IMHO, when there is only one binary package for a source package, I
see no strong point in having the binary package using ttf-foo or
otf-bar.
Of course, if you want to have separate packages, then you need to
find a method to name them.
How about fonts-<fontname>-{otf|ttf}?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature