Quoting Hideki Yamane (henrich@debian.or.jp): > Hi all, > > On Thu, 5 May 2011 06:28:43 +0200 > Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote: > > This is good as I think we reached some kind of consensus with last > > proposals, assuming the "foundry" part is considered to be optional. > > Any conclusion? > a. to be optional > b. should not be present at all unless there are multiple packages with the same name > c. other I'd vote for a., as a "should" Something like "When a foundry or font author provides several fonts that are packaged separately, package names should include the foundry (or author's) name before the font name: fonts-<foundry|author->fontname".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature