[Pkg-fonts-devel] "foundry" part is ? (Re: Font packages renaming mini-HOWTO?)
Hi all,
On Thu, 5 May 2011 06:28:43 +0200
Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> This is good as I think we reached some kind of consensus with last
> proposals, assuming the "foundry" part is considered to be optional.
Any conclusion?
a. to be optional
b. should not be present at all unless there are multiple packages with the same name
c. other
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
Reply to: