Pn, 2008 09 05 09:34 +0300, Kęstutis Biliūnas rašė: > So, I also had suggestion to split our fontforge source package into > four source packages with the corresponding binary packages: > > fontforge -> fontforge, libfontforge1, fontforge-dev, puthon-fontforge > (and maybe fontforge-nox); > > fontforge-doc -> fontforge-doc; > > mensis -> mensis. > > fontforge-extras -> fontforge-extras (for the encodings.ps, cidmaps and > showttf) > > This will make the maintaining easier and the packages will be build > from the upstream tarballs (now we ourselves make the .tar.gz file from > three upstream .tar.bz2 files). But this is very big changes and must be > agreement between all our team. Why nobody is interested in that problem? Well, I have prepared the some draft packages for the review. These packages can be found on my apt repository at http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/fontforge/ . Perhaps that will start a discussion about the sense of such changes. First of all I want to hear the opinion from Christian and Davide. And if you agree with such changes, I will start to prepare the similar packages on the our SVN repository for the experimental branch. -- Kęstutis Biliūnas <kebil@kaunas.init.lt> http://kebil.ghost.lt | GnuPG-Key ID: F6E7A452
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0i?= =?UTF-8?Q?_lai=C5=A1ko?= dalis yra =?UTF-8?Q?pasira=C5=A1yta?= skaitmeniniu =?UTF-8?Q?b=C5=ABdu?=