Re: weird: nslookup can't resolve hostnames
> mario@cancun.net wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The ip address as DNS nameservers are obtained via DHCP from my ISP,
>> these
>> name servers are the same I've specified staticaly for each of my
>> internal
>> boxes. I use the same rules for iptables to set the firewall, but
>> 'nslookup' still sending the same problem, with firewall rules up or
>> not.
>>
>
> is the name server reported by nslookup and the actual name server
> assigned by your ISP the same ? it is possible that the ISP has assigned
> a different NS but nslookup is still looking for an outdated one.
i agree with that my friend
you should set external dns server in the resolv.conf or in the squid dns
resolver config to resolve the address , because you are using dhcp and as
before our friend sayd , the nslookup may be looking for an outdated one
:)
> Also, how are the DNS set in dansguardian and Squid ?
>
> --
> Random Quotes From Megas XLR
> Coop: You see? The mysteries of the Universe are revealed when you break
> stuff.
> Jamie: When in doubt, blow up a planet.
> Kiva: It's an 80 foot robot, if we can't see it, absolutely it's not here.
> Glorft Technician: Unnecessary use of force in capturing the Earthers
> has been approved.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que está limpio.
> MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo.
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------
Luis A. Rondon Paz
L I N U X .~. Admin intranet CNT
The Choice /V\ icq #132736035
of a GNU /( )\ itachi@cnt.uo.edu.cu
Generation ^^-^^ Santiago de cuba
UONET
-------------------------------------------------
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo.
Reply to: