Re: no ipchains with 2.2/no network with 2.4

["Pierre A. Damas" <pierredamas@hotmail.com>]

# ipchains -A input -l -j ACCEPT

So it doesn't seem to be a terminal one.
Symptoms are the same if I flush all rules and specify policies to be 
ACCEPT.

# ipchains -F
# ipchains -P input ACCEPT
etc. (for all chains)

Pierre A.

> From: Gian Piero Carrubba <gp-ml@rm-rf.it>
> To: debian-firewall@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: no ipchains with 2.2/no network with 2.4
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:21:14 +0100
>
> Il giorno dom, 09-01-2005 alle 18:09 +0100, Pierre A. Damas ha scritto:
> > If I put all policies (input, output, forward) to ACCEPT and add only 
> one
> > accept rule with logging enabled, I see a lot of activity passing 
> through
> > ipchains, but not going anywhere though.
> > (Ping hangs, frees or whatever, and produces 100% packet losts, on my
> > internal and external/dmz network)
>
> Well, last time i've used ipchains was far long away, so i'm not sure i
> can remember all the differences with iptables/netfilter. However, iirc,
> with ipchains the logging target was a "terminal" one. I mean, the
> packet was logged and then discarded, so a LOG target acted as a DENY
> one with addictional logging feature. If i'm right, I don't know how can
> you add an "accept rule with logging enabled".
>
> Ciao,
> Gian Piero.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> listmaster@lists.debian.org

_________________________________________________________________
Try MSN Messenger 7.0 beta http://messenger.msn.be/beta