Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc

To: Jim Heck <pinball.rules@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-embedded@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:56:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTimLmTuaZbX7C4FFBTttchNQSwcOOYP4zhu4LGNp@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4C49D5A4.6030204@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4C49D5A4.6030204@gmail.com>

Hello Jim,

Thanks for the contributions :)

2010/7/23 Jim Heck <pinball.rules@gmail.com>:
> binutils
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590101
> gcc-4.4
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590102

Yes, that is the way to do such things in Debian terms :)

Out of curiosity, are you just interested on armel architecture? Other
architectures need more love at the moment.

Cheers,
-- 
 Héctor Orón

"Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar
System, which one day will disconnect us."

-- Day DVB-T stop working nicely
Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
  - From: Jim Heck <jim.heck@oracle.com>

References:
- Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
  - From: Jim Heck <pinball.rules@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
Next by Date: Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
Previous by thread: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
Next by thread: Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread