On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:34:36 +0000 Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> wrote: > +++ Neil Williams [2010-01-22 19:16 +0000]: > > Had a query about the following ARM chips - to my untrained hardware > > eye, these all look armel but can someone verify the list for me? > > chips are not 'arm' or 'armel' - that's entirely a feature of the > software run on them. Chips have instructions sets/achitecture > versions. OK, then what I really wanted to know was whether any of the ARM chips that I did list (excepting the two x86 ones) would require ARM software instead of armel. > So is the question that you want to know which ARM architecture these > CPUs are? I *think* most are either ARM9 or ARM11 - I'm just seeking confirmation that all these would be OK with armel packages rather than needing ARM. > > VIA VT8500 ARM 300MHz > > Samsung 2443 CPU ARM 400MHz or 533MHz > > SiRF Antlas IV (A4), ARM11 500MHz > > Marvell PXA303 624MHz > > VIA CPU 250MHz + 200MHz DSP > > Samsung dual Core 6410 CPU 667Mhz (ARM 11, 3D engine) > > SiRF Prima dual Core 667Mhz (ARM 11, 3D engine) I get confused about the different ARM types and which map to armel. :-( -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpWNLDkCcH33.pgp
Description: PGP signature