On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:56:55 +0100 Nick Bane <nick@cecomputing.co.uk> wrote: > After discussing this with Wookey he suggested that I documented a fix to a > Debian etch cross development nuisance when test building bootldr. > > Installing gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu seemed ok till I ran nm-arm-linux-gnu. > This segfaulted. > > The problem was localised to binutils brokenness (as claimed by Wookey). > > I noted that my debian etch machine had binutils-arm-linux and not > binutils-arm-linux-gnu but both with the same version tag. > > Removing the non-gnu and adding the -gnu package seemed to fix it. > > Nick Bane Are you using emdebian-tools or is this using gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu-gcc directly? I could add a check to emsetup to remove binutils-arm-linux in preference for binutils-arm-linux-gnu but it depends where the binutils-arm-linux package came from. I find no matches in the current repositories. (binutils-multiarch will be a dependency of dpkg-cross 2.0.0) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpo0NQ06iiMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature