Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:07:39 +0000 with message-id <20070311230739.2f727daf.codehelp@debian.org> and subject line closing without a reply has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dpkg-cross being too clever!
- From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:09:54 +0100
- Message-id: <20010923210954.I7110@tardis>
Package: dpkg-cross Version: 1.13 Hi, Dpkg-cross attempts to be a little too clever and skips packages with just executables in; while it is true that these don't need to be installed for a cross build environment other packages still seem to depend on them (e.g. in my case libstdc++-m68k-cross depending on g++-m68k-cross) and if I force libstdc++ in then it annoys apt-get upgrade which moans about the lack of dependency. I suggest there needs to be an option to make it not skip. Dave P.S. An apt-get hack to allow you to pull in dependent cross files would be great! ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 113279-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing without a reply
- From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:07:39 +0000
- Message-id: <20070311230739.2f727daf.codehelp@debian.org>
After waiting for a reply, I've decided to close this bug report because the requested functionality is, IMHO, present in the apt-cross package. If this bug is to be reopened, it should also be reassigned to apt-cross. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/Attachment: pgpW4_pqcWSjx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---