Re: dpkg-architecture adaptations for e.g. uclibc
+++ Volker Grabsch [06-06-14 20:50 +0200]:
>
> Why not? Until now, I just heart about feelings .. about your feeling
> that it's and Martin Guy's feeling that it sounds good. Were are the
> facts? What are the real problems that may arise when adding more CPU
> types to dpkg-architecture? What are the counter-arguments that make you
> think it won't be acceptable?
<lots of good stuff>
I agree with all of that Volker. I think you put it very well. Would you
care to forward it to the dpkg maintainers (with a link to this thread or
some more background)? (not sure if there are any reading this list...) And
a post something like that needs to go to Debian-devel to see if there is
any consensus there. That would need some more background on why this
matters.
Wookey
--
Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679
work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/
Reply to: