Re: How do I fix a -dcv1 vs. -cross mess?
Phil Endecott wrote:
>> gcc-3.4 was fixed in 3.4.6-2
>> gcc-4.0 was fixed in 4.0.3-3
>> gcc-4.1 was fixed in 4.1.0-2
>>
>> gcc-3.3 has not been fixed.
>
> Some progress! There is a fix for gcc-3.3, but it hasn't been applied
> to a release yet:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357629
>
> I have built a gcc-3.3 with this patch, and it almost works; but I fear
> there must be a bug in the patch as I get this in the resulting
> libstdc++-dev:
>
> Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev-armeb-cross
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: extra
> Section: devel
> Installed-Size: 4492
> Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
> Architecture: all
> Source: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.6-13
> Provides: libstdc++-dev-armeb-cross, libstdc++-dev-armeb-dcv1,
> libstdc++1-3.3-armeb-dcv1
> Depends: gcc-3.3-base (>= 1:3.3.6-13), libstdc++5-armeb-cross (>=
> 1:3.3.6-13), libc6-dev-armeb-cross (>= 2.3.2.ds1-16),
> g++-3.3-armeb-linux-gnu (>= 1:3.3.6-13)
> Description: The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development files)
>
> The problem is in the provides: line; libstdc++1-3.3-armeb-dcv1 should
> (surely?) say "5" not "1".
>
> If anyone knows the meaning of things like GCC_SO and CXX_SO in
> rules/control.m4, please let me know. The patch for gcc-3.4 is slightly
> different, so I'm going to see if I can learn anything from it.
Yes, that patch is wrong, I'll post a bug followup as a first thing tomorrow.
Apparently gcc maintainers are not doing their job for gcc-3.3, the patches
for gcc-3.4 upto gcc-4.1 were integrated in no time...
>
> Wookey wrote:
>> write this up on the debian.org wiki
>
> I maintain a page on the NSLU2 wiki:
>
> http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/DebianSlug/CrossCompiling
>
> You're welcome to link to it.
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
>
Pjotr
Reply to: