On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 15:15 -0400, ER wrote: > Hi all, > I've ran into some problems that some of you may be able to answer. I have my file system in flash using the jffs2 filesystem. I ran a simple application that accesses a network camera and spits out some data. > > I've notice that when the jffs2 file system is considerably slower than the nfs filesystem. Is that normal? Not to mention that my application is also very much slower. > > What can be done? Is cramfs faster then jffs2? > > I'm considering loading the required libraries in RAM so as to speed up things (so I think atleast), will that be any help. I'm saying this although I haven't figured out how this works as yet. > > My explaination is that the library access time (dynamically linked) is much slower on jffs2 than nfs but I'm still baffled why?! > Any my solution would be to have a ramfs which would be a copy of the flash filesystem. > Does that make any sense? Help??? I do not know if it is faster, but maybe you can try this: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/yaffs/ I haven't tested it myself, it is just a hint. Greetings, Oliver
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part