[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Technical choices for generating 'without docs' packages

Hello Benjamin, 
Quoting Henrion Benjamin <bh@udev.org>: 
> Just to know what kind of choices are the best to generate packages 
> without docs... 
> Do we have found a concensus on this question? 
Well during the Linux-user expo in London last week Wookey, Peter Naulls, Jon 
Masters, Justin Cormack and I have decided to give Stag a first go. I updated 
the quickstartguide on my site, and the stag-addons package should provide you 
with the needed tools. I haven't had time yet to update all the packages on 
the site. But the busybox package should be usable. Give it a try.  
See also Wookey's announcement on the emdebian website. 
PS: could you enable the wiki please? 
| Philippe De Swert -GNU/linux - uClinux freak-      
| Stag developer http://stag.mind.be/  
| Emdebian developer: http://www.emdebian.org  
| Please do not send me documents in a closed format. (*.doc,*.xls,*.ppt)    
| Use the open alternatives. (*.pdf,*.ps,*.html,*.txt)    
| Why? http://pallieter.is-a-geek.org:7832/~johan/word/english/    

Gestuurd via het webmailsysteem van het De Nayer Instituut: www.denayer.be

Reply to: