Re: Technical choices for generating 'without docs' packages

[Philippe De Swert <philippe.deswert@student.denayer.wenk.be>]

Hello Benjamin, 
 
Quoting Henrion Benjamin <bh@udev.org>: 
 
>  
> Just to know what kind of choices are the best to generate packages 
> without docs... 
>  
> Do we have found a concensus on this question? 
 
Well during the Linux-user expo in London last week Wookey, Peter Naulls, Jon 
Masters, Justin Cormack and I have decided to give Stag a first go. I updated 
the quickstartguide on my site, and the stag-addons package should provide you 
with the needed tools. I haven't had time yet to update all the packages on 
the site. But the busybox package should be usable. Give it a try.  
 
See also Wookey's announcement on the emdebian website. 
 
regards, 
 
Philippe 
 
PS: could you enable the wiki please? 
| Philippe De Swert -GNU/linux - uClinux freak-      
|      
| Stag developer http://stag.mind.be/  
| Emdebian developer: http://www.emdebian.org  
|   
| Please do not send me documents in a closed format. (*.doc,*.xls,*.ppt)    
| Use the open alternatives. (*.pdf,*.ps,*.html,*.txt)    
| Why? http://pallieter.is-a-geek.org:7832/~johan/word/english/    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gestuurd via het webmailsysteem van het De Nayer Instituut: www.denayer.be