Re: circular dependencies in debian -> impact on emdebian
+++ Riku Voipio [04-04-06 21:49 +0300]:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 04:05:54PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > This is a fundamental problem which we want to minimise, but as you observe
> > we have to do some maintenance whateer happens. This is minimised by pushing
> > all this sort of policy up into Debian as 'Debian policy to keep Emdebian
> > happy', which is possible in the long term. I'm not sure it matters much
> > exactly which files the changes live in - whatever makes a practical solution.
> I would still rather maintain a relative patchset to rules/control/etc
> than have an entirely separate dir.
It's certainly attractive if we can make it work.
> However, I'm pretty new here, and
> I don't know how large changes are typical.
I don't think any of us do yet - that's part of the problem. It's hard to
make good technical choices without sufficient data. That's why we need to
try stuff out.
> And if we can avoid changes
> entirely, or make them part of the official package, the less time
Ultimately everything will part of the official package - the question is
exactly what form it will take.
I'm currently comparing our ideas so far with how the udebs are done.
Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679
work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/