[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#921413: TODO list for RFS: php-elisp/1.21.0-1 [ITA]



On 2019-02-05 00:52:47, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Package: php-elisp
> Version: 1.21.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Thank you for much for sponsoring src:php-elisp!  I've created a
> tracking bug for these issues, replied inline, and plan to fix them in
> the next upload.
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 12:40:40PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> I uploaded the package, but I'll note some improvements that could be
>> done on it:
>> 

[...]

>>  2. very minor, but i like to keep the "transitional package" phrase on
>>     a separate line in package descriptions so it's more obvious to
>>     someone looking at the description
>
> Do you mean like this?:
> Short description:  transitional package from old-foo to new-foo package
>  Old-foo description, and why new-foo...
>  .
>  This is a transitional dummy package and can be safely removed.

Correct.

>>  3. why was the php-root self-test disabled? what's the next step for
>>     that patch? can it be sent upstream or will we have to carry this on
>>     forever?
>
> (ert-deftest php-project-root ()
>   (should (string= (abbreviate-file-name default-directory)
>                    (php-project-get-root-dir))))
>
> Evals to "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/" instead of the real path.  It will take
> some time to review the changelogs and git history of my other
> packages to find the workaround for this sbuild/buildd quirk, because
> I didn't write "PKGBUILDDIR" as a keyword the last time I ran into it.
> Oops...  Thus, I confess to choosing the fastest/easiest path since
> the freeze is so close.

No problem. It was a bit of a rhetorical question: if you had explained
that in the comment of the patch, as per DEP-3, I wouldn't have needed
to ask. ;)

https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/

A.
-- 
In serious work commanding and discipline are of little avail.
                         - Peter Kropotkin


Reply to: