[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#921413: TODO list for RFS: php-elisp/1.21.0-1 [ITA]



Package: php-elisp
Version: 1.21.0-1
Severity: normal

Hi Antoine,

Thank you for much for sponsoring src:php-elisp!  I've created a
tracking bug for these issues, replied inline, and plan to fix them in
the next upload.

On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 12:40:40PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I uploaded the package, but I'll note some improvements that could be
> done on it:
> 
>  1. newer versions of debhelper allow deduplicating information between
>     the control file and debian/compat. just remove the latter and
>     change the control dependency to "debhelper-compat (=11)" (or
>     12). see also:
> 
>     https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/debhelper-compat-12-is-now-released/

Oh!  Thank you for telling me about this :-)  (I didn't know)

>  2. very minor, but i like to keep the "transitional package" phrase on
>     a separate line in package descriptions so it's more obvious to
>     someone looking at the description

Do you mean like this?:
Short description:  transitional package from old-foo to new-foo package
 Old-foo description, and why new-foo...
 .
 This is a transitional dummy package and can be safely removed.

>  3. why was the php-root self-test disabled? what's the next step for
>     that patch? can it be sent upstream or will we have to carry this on
>     forever?

(ert-deftest php-project-root ()
  (should (string= (abbreviate-file-name default-directory)
                   (php-project-get-root-dir))))

Evals to "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/" instead of the real path.  It will take
some time to review the changelogs and git history of my other
packages to find the workaround for this sbuild/buildd quirk, because
I didn't write "PKGBUILDDIR" as a keyword the last time I ran into it.
Oops...  Thus, I confess to choosing the fastest/easiest path since
the freeze is so close.

> Thanks for your work! :)

You're welcome :-D

--
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: