Re: Xemacs needs help
Jérôme Marant <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Quoting Brian Nelson <email@example.com>:
>> > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS snapshots.
>> > What distribution do you think it would fit the best?:
>> > - unstable
>> > - experimental
>> > - none of the above, a stagging area would be better
>> Keep in mind that anything uploaded to unstable really should be fit for
>> a stable Debian release (IMO anyway).
> RC bugs prevent packages to enter testing.
And that's an ugly kludge that should be used minimally and only
temporarily (again IMO).
> And as long as experimental is not autobuilt, there is not other
> way to get such a package built on other architecures.
Of course you can, but not in an automated way. Why isn't experimental
Don't worry, it's *in*-flammable.