Re: Reproducible builds for fwupdate
Gah, missed this in my inbox - sorry!
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:48:54AM -0500, Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was really hoping to make fwupdate's build fully reproducible in
>the last upload, but it seems it still failed on the PO file:
>https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/fwupdate.html
>
>I had tried to fix this with
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/uefi/fwupdate.git/commit/?id=d498e174b63c439e73a64b10ca3937f9f4901a1d
but that seems to have still not done the trick.
>
>To me this looks like it might be a matter of a TZ variable from the
>buildd leaking into the environment. Could I get another set of eyes
>whether this fix should do the trick to resolve in the next upload?
>
>diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
>index 6181785..1cd009f 100755
>--- a/debian/rules
>+++ b/debian/rules
>@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>
>DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
>EFIDIR ?= $(shell dpkg-vendor --query vendor | awk '{ print tolower($$0) }')
>-PODATE := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog --show-field Date | xargs -0 date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M%z" --date)
>+PODATE := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog --show-field Date | xargs -0 date --utc "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M%z" --date)
I'd just use "-u" rather than "--utc" normally, but this looks like it
should help yes!
>SB_PACKAGE :=
>ifeq (yes,$(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes))
>
>Mario Limonciello
>Dell | CPG Software Engineering
>
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,
Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to
concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud.
Reply to: