[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RAID1 & UEFI: support for twin ESPs in GRUB



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> I am afraid I don't have time to start a discussion in such a large
> cross-operating-system forum. Any help from anyone willing to bring
> that to the UEFI forum will be much appreciated.

It is merely a new mailing list created by the UEFI Forum so they
could better reach out to FOSS-based OSes. Debian is not the only OS
that should address multiple ESPs, that is something that other OSes
should also have some input into.

By posting to their GNU Mailman-based mailing list, you'll reach the
right UEFI Forum members, who are on the list, and are looking to
reach out to address FOSS OS issues like this.

> P.S.: I am not sure I understand what exactly the issue with 
> multiple ESPs may be, from the UEFI firmware point of view.

That is the question to bring up to UEFI Forum, via this new list, so
that all OSes, not just Debian, can address it, if it not already
addressed in spec/EDK-II implementation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=O8Zn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: