On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > > edu-testing-nolocal-netinst \ > > edu-testing-nolocal-dvd \ > > jessie-amd64-i386-netinst \ > > jessie-usbstick > > which makes me wonder: shouldnt we rename those images now to > > stretch-amd64-i386-netinst and stretch-amd64-usbstick? > seems ok. done so now, I've added stretch-amd64-i386-netinst and stretch-usbstick. And then I realized: - stretch-amd64-i386-netinst has packages for amd64+i386 and allows to install on amd64 or i386 - stretch-usbstick has packages for amd64+i386 too but only allows installation on amd64. The i386 packages are for LTSP servers which default to create i386 LTSP schroots. Do we still want that? Should we rename this to stretch-amd64-usbstick still? -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature