control: retitle -1 rename thin-client-server profile to ltsp-server-profile Hi, so I thought about this some more and came to this conclusion because… ltsp-server-profile is correct and and for those who don't know it, it's as cryptic as terminal-server-profile. if one doesnt know "ltsp" nor "terminal", both are meaningless and need to be explained. (easy with ltsp: we use the ltsp-server project…) - OTOH if one knows the term "terminal" it's not obvious that "LTSP"-terminals are ment. and if one knows "LTSP", the name is also obvious. It's also true that the ltsp-server-profile provides more services than just "LTSP", but today, the LTSP functionality of these servers is the main one, so I think the name "ltsp-server-profile" is indeed good. And should we, after basically using LTSP forever, switch away from LTSP as the main technology for this, I think it will also be sensible to rename the profile again, to make this change very clear. But I don't suppose this will happen any time soon :) -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature