Hi, On Samstag, 5. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > If the blocker for the other three is that they'd end up with higher > versions than the current sid packages, then uploading them now is > fine. > > The archive version constraints apply to stable, not p-u, so it's fine > as long as things are sorted out before the point release (or during, if > we bumped the p-u versions up in to testing and sid). ok, thats very cool. I'll keep an eye on these constraints, but am very happy that we can match them on our own. Uploads targeted for jessie are a good idea anyway :-) Currently, from the four uploaded packages only debian-edu-artwork doesnt match this contraint, but there is a sourceful change in the queue too (just a change to the rules clean target...) > > > I realise it's not entirely the answer you were looking for, but I'd be > > > happy for you to upload -artwork, -doc, -install and sitesummary > > > already. -artwork, -install and sitesummary have also been uploaded now (with +deb7u1 version numbers), sitesummary I've also uploaded with with a sourceful change and a new version to sid, so no work for ftpmasters here, same for debian-edu- install, there is a source full change in sid too. So that leaves three packages: debian-edu, debian-edu-config and slbackup. Am I right to assume you'd be happy if we'd upload debian-edu with the chmsee recommends removed and slbackup with that NACKed change removed? (And you continue pondering what to do with debiane-edu-config? ;) cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.