[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#725311: pu: Getting Debian Edu 7.1+edu0 into the Upcoming stable point release (7.2)

On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 21:37 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > So to be (crystal) clear: we should reupload slbackup with those
> > > NACKed
> > > changes removed?!
> > I'm arguing with myself a little over that one, in the "should we just
> > cover it under 'only -edu probably use it'" general sort of area.
> :-) I'm curious for the result of this arguing! :)

Me too :)

> > > Ok, changelog diff attached. For all 7 packages combined.
> > What's happening with education-task-lxde and chmsee? I noticed that's
> > not in the proposed d-e changelog.
> You send the mail about chmsee the day after we released Debian Edu Wheezy and 
> these changes are only those, thats why. I've removed the chmsee recommends in 
> svn, but that change hasn't been uploaded yet. And as it's recommends it 
> doesnt really matter anyway, though obviously I'd be happy to upload a changed 
> package still.

Okay. If you're happy that leaving it in the recommends doesn't cause
you any issues (at least for the package in the main archive rather than
the -edu one) then I'll leave that up to you.

> Which brings me back to my initial question whether we should reupload these 
> packages to wheezy(-proposed updates) with ~deb7u1 added to the version 
> number?

I was going to say "go ahead with the packages we didn't have queries
on" but I've just noticed in the -edu changelog that it adds a
dependency on the new package from -config. :(

I realise it's not entirely the answer you were looking for, but I'd be
happy for you to upload -artwork, -doc, -install and sitesummary



Reply to: