Hi, On Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > So to be (crystal) clear: we should reupload slbackup with those > > NACKed > > changes removed?! > I'm arguing with myself a little over that one, in the "should we just > cover it under 'only -edu probably use it'" general sort of area. :-) I'm curious for the result of this arguing! :) > > Ok, changelog diff attached. For all 7 packages combined. > What's happening with education-task-lxde and chmsee? I noticed that's > not in the proposed d-e changelog. You send the mail about chmsee the day after we released Debian Edu Wheezy and these changes are only those, thats why. I've removed the chmsee recommends in svn, but that change hasn't been uploaded yet. And as it's recommends it doesnt really matter anyway, though obviously I'd be happy to upload a changed package still. Which brings me back to my initial question whether we should reupload these packages to wheezy(-proposed updates) with ~deb7u1 added to the version number? cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.