Hi Adam, On Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The complete debdiffs are attached. > No, they're not. :-) (or the mail would probably never have made it to > -release). shall I attach them to this bug? [debian-edu-config-gosa-netgroups] > Well, we've always nacked introducing new binary packages in the past. > You mention that it was in squeeze, but I can't see the packages in the > main archive (only for jessie / sid). hm, seems the archive is right and my memory is wrong. So we only had that package in our squeeze release and at that time in sid too... > slbackup (0.0.12-4) experimental; urgency=low > [...] > * Change in conffile management: > + Drop CRON job /etc/cron.daily/slbackup. Re-enable configuration > of slbackup via debconf templates (closes: #662914). > + Remove conffile /etc/cron.daily/slbackup via dpkg−maintscript−helper. > Didn't the above change already get NACKed at least once? I think so yes. Would a reupload with these changes dropped be more acceptable? Also, I forgot to mention, while slbackup (and slbackup-php) are not in the debian-edu* namespace, in practice they are: the "sl" stands for "skolelinux" so thats just another case of not following up to an existing naming scheme... So, what shall we do with this? (#725311 as a whole...) cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.