Re: NFS options

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NFS options
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:18:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 2flty37f7e4.fsf@diskless.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120203225201.19181lvahvdixzb5@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>
References: <[🔎] 20120203205522.GA7098@ticino.com> <[🔎] 20120203210442.GD8761@login1.uio.no> <[🔎] 20120203225201.19181lvahvdixzb5@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>

[Mike Gabriel]
> I am not sure about the performance improvement, never encountered a  
> loss of performance. But having some ports less being open on TJENER  
> is worth closing down the named services, isn't it?

Sure.  But I believe LTSP still use NFSv4 for its root file system, so
changing it on tjener is not really realistic yet.  Am I wrong?

I really wonder what kind of performance improvement that could be
measured by dropping rpc.statd.
-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NFS options
  - From: Wolfgang Schweer <schweer@cityweb.de>

References:
- NFS options
  - From: Giorgio Pioda <gfwp@ticino.com>
- Re: NFS options
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: NFS options
  - From: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#658563: debian-edu-config: [INTL:id] Indonesian debconf templates translation
Next by Date: Re: NFS options
Previous by thread: Re: NFS options
Next by thread: Re: NFS options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread