Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:56:16 +0200
Message-id: <201010301756.17147.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <20101030154850.GB5089@login1.uio.no>
References: <201010301535.11459.holger@layer-acht.org> <201010301629.01250.holger@layer-acht.org> <20101030154850.GB5089@login1.uio.no>

Hi,

On Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Well, LTSP failed to install from DVD when I updated the list of
> kernels to included on the DVD.

Thats a very different statement then saying LTSP doesnt work with 686.


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>

References:
- should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Next by Date: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Previous by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Next by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread