[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lenny release timeline canceled by constant changes



Hi,

Andreas B. Mundt schrieb:
> Remaining bugs: Things in general and probably (complex) software in
> particular will never be perfect. There will be bugs, sure. But there
> will be bugs forever. How long is the expected life of lenny? If
> squeeze is released this year why not trying to release the "perfect"
> Edu-squeeze pretty soon afterwards, and have lenny as an in-between
> step?  

I've been using the Lenny version productive in a school for months, and
it works. Lenny works!
Maybe not flawless, but we will never get to that point.

> If I recall the atmosphere last night on IRC and consider the amount
> of work done today on the documentation: I have the feeling that many
> of us are highly motivated to improve things and prepare a good release. 
> But to keep this spirit alive it's important to finish this work soon,
> to see a goal which can be achieved in the near future. You can ride a
> horse to death.  
> 
> It would be an extreme pity to see all this motivation collapse into
> frustration, dispute, disappointment and bad feelings. And that is the
> worst bug ever.    
> 
> Come on! You all have come so far. It's a pleasure to have a
> Skolelinux network running in my virtual machines! Let's finish lenny
> and after that head for an improved point release or a perfect squeeze.

I share your opinion.
Kick lenny out into the open now, or it's too late and not worth any
more effort.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Philipp Hübner <debalance@debian.org>
: :'  :  pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225  3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
`. `'`   HP: http://www.debalance.de, Skype: philipp-huebner
  `-     ICQ: 235-524-440, Jabber: der_schakal@jabber.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: