Re: should iceweasel really be the default browser?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:29:41AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>[Jonas Smedegaard]
>> Those warnings being more annoying is intentional. It is a security
>> *improvement* over earlier versions of that browser.
>
>So the Firefox developers claim. Not everyone agrees. Personally, I
>do not agree with their position, and find the obnoxous messages from
>Iceweasel a step back securitywise.
Perhaps file a bugreport against Iceweasel, then?
If for nothing else, then for having a broader discussion about the
issue.
I won't file such bugreport, as I find it perfectly sane to be obnoxious
about unverifiable encryption (e.g. use of self-signed certificates).
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAkobsSMACgkQn7DbMsAkQLh2+gCgoQDgHgRMDVGUbUBC8IwQQ392
0ocAoIE3tunD0TpLgaimJHyfo0RX/bvc
=OdSo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: