Re: Criteria for educational software

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Criteria for educational software
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 07:51:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0809080749340.19684@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080907142220.GC8699@jones.dk>
References: <[🔎] 83b8dc7c0809070209y31de21cer77ebb92153371d71@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080907114044.GA10822@klodrik.uio.no> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0809071352140.9120@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 200809071457.22038.rgx@gmx.de> <[🔎] 20080907142220.GC8699@jones.dk>

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

But sure, go ahead and setup an isolated structure for non-packaged
stuff or if not interested in pushing the broader perspective here.


There is an "isolated" structure in the tasks files inside the
debian-edu source package (prospective packages).

Kind regards

         Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: "Ji ZhengYu" <zhengyuji@gmail.com>
- Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Criteria for educational software
  - From: RalfGesellensetter <rgx@gmx.de>
- Re: Criteria for educational software
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: Criteria for educational software
Next by Date: Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
Previous by thread: Re: Criteria for educational software
Next by thread: Re: Criteria for educational software
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread