Re: Criteria for educational software

To: RalfGesellensetter <rgx@gmx.de>
Cc: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Criteria for educational software
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 07:49:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0809080745381.19684@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200809071457.22038.rgx@gmx.de>
References: <[🔎] 83b8dc7c0809070209y31de21cer77ebb92153371d71@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080907114044.GA10822@klodrik.uio.no> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.10.0809071352140.9120@wr-linux02> <[🔎] 200809071457.22038.rgx@gmx.de>

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, RalfGesellensetter wrote:

Practically aspects:
Software that is already being used by teachers in educational context
might be called fit for school.


This aspect seems to be reasonable at first glance, but I feel unhappy
with this.  The reason is that several Free Software programs are not
used for only one reason: Because they are not known to their target
audience.  So leaving out a program because we do not know anybody who
is using it seems to be a very weak reason.

I agree with the other items.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Criteria for educational software
  - From: RalfGesellensetter <rgx@gmx.de>

References:
- does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: "Ji ZhengYu" <zhengyuji@gmail.com>
- Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Criteria for educational software
  - From: RalfGesellensetter <rgx@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: does anyone know a substitution for CrystalMaker
Next by Date: Re: Criteria for educational software
Previous by thread: Re: Criteria for educational software
Next by thread: Re: Criteria for educational software
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread