Re: Do we need all these duplicate packages on the CD?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:31:24AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>> cpp-4.1_4.1.2-19_i386.deb
>> gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-19_i386.deb
>> gcc-4.1_4.1.2-19_i386.deb
>> gcj-4.1-base_4.1.2-16_i386.deb
>
> I guess that #374049 is one reason that gcc-4.1 stuff is pulled in.
> I forced 4.[23] in some library packages I recently packaged by shipping
> a patched d-shlibmove in the debian directory. Junichi is on VAC for
> the moment and so probably not much will happen.
For lenny you need not fork d-shlibs, but can instead use the following:
--override s/libstdc++6-dev//
(or some specific other version in the rare case you built using a
compiler different from the default one.
Remember to then also use versioned d-shlibs build-depends for the
inclusion of that --override option (don't remember the version - look
it up in its changelog).
I suspect that your proposed fix, Andreas, is not valid. It seems that
it simply grabs the first c++ compiler it finds installed - but what if
several compilers are installed and a non-default one is picked to build
the problematically-to-resolve library?
Cc'ing the bugreport this additional info.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIGETsn7DbMsAkQLgRAgH+AJ9+PXDCmXlHqlVULn1bJebfhwm7VQCbB82Y
VwSUm9Tqa1jKVn0u/6AtDSY=
=Ndim
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: