Hi! * Klaus Ade Johnstad <klaus@skolelinux.no> [051124 19:23]: > Why did you backport OpenOffice.org2, The mentioned backports are those from Debians OOo team... > when there is perfectly working deb's already out there? > Such as from > http://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/680/RC3/ They might work well enough, but it's a joke to call them perfect, isn't it? Beside that they are not apt-get-able and that there are no source packages available (or am I blind?), they violate Debian Policy (install to /opt, bah) and seem to be monolingual... and that are only the problems I saw with a quick check, if you like call lintian on any of those debs ;) I would prefer the backports by Debians OOo team. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature