Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:00:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0509280758160.20205@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050927202158.GD6658@schuldei.org>
References: <[🔎] 1127847755.1140.185.camel@static02.intern> <[🔎] 20050927201005.GB19493@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 20050927202158.GD6658@schuldei.org>

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Andreas Schuldei wrote:

and can you search in pdfs with xpdf by now?


<Ctrl-F>

Kind regards

         Andreas.

PS: BTW, before you ask, I just filed the evince problem with blank white pages
    I spoke about in my last mail.  In fact evince is promissing but obviuosely
    needs some work.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.
  - From: Harald Thingelstad <harald@skolelinux.no>
- Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)
  - From: Andreas Schuldei <andreas@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf?
Next by Date: Re: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.
Previous by thread: Re: [debian-edu] Re: Why acroread instead of xpdf? (Was: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.)'
Next by thread: Re: A swim in icewm, and a choice of applications.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread