Re: What's wrong with Plone?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 14-03-2005 17:59, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 15:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>Skolelinux has decided to drop Plone and use eZ Publish instead, both
>>for the project website and a recommended CMS for schools.
>>
>>As I understand it (from the short meeting on the topic I participated
>>at the Skolelinux gathering in january) some reasons are political (bad
>>support of Skolelinux from core Plone guys, promise of good support from
>>eZ guys), and some reasons are technical.
>>
>>Can anyone please help provide details on the technical shortcomings of
>>Plone?
>
>
> - no notification that something changed -> difficult to keep translations
> in sync which needs to be done manually
> - no ability to work on the site offline
Those seem to be arguments against both Plone and eZ Publish. I am aware
that those issues were raised during the discussion, but what I seek is
the actual arguments for switching.
Sorry for expressing the question too vaguely. Let me try again:
Can anyone please provide details of the technical _reasons_ behind the
Skolelinux decision to _switch_ from Plone to eZ Publish?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCNcYRn7DbMsAkQLgRAodXAJ9emwMIueujO3y/Zg16TRayHNuwnwCgjmNu
OI0n1FTa3T69N61tcRglOvU=
=usJM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: