Re: Release 0.9.13 of Dr. Geo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[My response is at the bottom]
Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
| Hello Jonas,
|
| No I dit not want to send notice to the package maintainer, I just
| want to say about a new release.
|
| As I am the upstream author and the package maintainer aswell, the
| .deb package should be available in Debian repository in a couple of
| hours.
|
| Regards,
|
| Hilaire
|
|
| Le mar 08/06/2004 à 15:44, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
|
| Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
| | Hello,
| |
| | Dr. Geo is an interactive geometry software featuring unique features as
| | scriptability, interfaca adaptability, functionaly defined interactive
| | figure.
| |
| | Release 0.9.13 is out since yesterday evening. It can be found at
| | http://www.ofset.org/drgeo
|
| Hi Hilaire!
|
| The best approach for noticing new upstream releases of software is to
| file a bugreport (severity "wishlist") against the Debian package
| containing it.
Oh sorry, I was not aware (and did not check) that you maintained the
package yourself.
In that case I suggest in the future that you mention more clearly your
intend of such posting.
I still do not understand why you want to explicitly make us debian-edu
folks aware of a new release of your software. Is the release critical
for possible adoption into debian-edu? Or for removal? Shoould we simply
~ know about your software then why focus on a specific release?
No matter what you reason is, please make it obvious.
(and no, I am not annoyed - just want to educate you, and others
listening on this list, to improve - for the good of us all).
Greetings,
~ - Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
~ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAxddjn7DbMsAkQLgRAockAJ9dPregw1VNVRRiFW7QfkShaQkMHQCglbXU
9xDrtmhGPLI2/eHd3Y2t7HQ=
=m7wd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: