Re: Q;Resetting Profiles?
Alex Brasetvik wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Ralf]
> >>As explanation: I am talking about generic user accounts, one for
> >>each thin client, that can be used until everybody owns their own
> > I believe it is a bad idea to not have separate accounts for each
> > person. You will open a can of worms with people doing bad things
> > without any accountability.
> However, in newer versions of KDE you may set up a fixed,
> unchangeable interface with the Kiosk mode. This might be useful
> in for instance the school librariy with a terminal on which you
> can only search for books.
> Alex Brasetvik
This security issue goes three ways:
1. against the system (which we presumable may do changes to safeguard
2. against other users, on this system or elsewhere.
3. against the organisation (which is actually legally responsible for actions
made trough their computers unless they are able to track the use and point
out who did use what protocol where and when.)
Number 1 is a computer programming and configuration issue. The two others are
Number 2 is a matter of social misbehaviour like harassment or victimising.
This are serious issues; at least in Norway these are criminal acts which in
rear cases are proven ultimately deadly for the victims of such.
Number 3 is a matter of the organisation being responsible enough to safeguard
themselves against consequences of people using their facilities to inflict
damage towards others trough sheer stupidity or in rear cases criminal acts.
We may be able to set up KDE in such a way that it is only possible to start
konqueror. This alone is unfortunately not efficient to address against 2 and
3 above. To be efficient we also need to lock down the browsing-capabilities
in konqueror so the user never reaches a sms-web-service, web-forum etc.
I don't know much about "kiosk-mode" other than it's possible to limit what
applications the user may start, so ultimately what I addresses here may not
be an issue any longer.